Divided Supreme Court rules no quick hearing required when police seize property
Time:2024-05-22 11:14:10 Source:worldViews(143)
WASHINGTON (AP) — A divided Supreme Court ruled Thursday that authorities do not have to provide a quick hearing when they seize cars and other property used in drug crimes, even when the property belongs to so-called innocent owners.
By a 6-3 vote, the justices rejected the claims of two Alabama women who had to wait more than a year for their cars to be returned. Police had stopped the cars when they were being driven by other people and, after finding drugs, seized the vehicles.
Civil forfeiture allows authorities to take someone’s property, without having to prove that it has been used for illicit purposes. Critics of the practice describe it as “legalized theft.”
Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote for the conservative majority that a civil forfeiture hearing to determine whether an owner will lose the property permanently must be timely. But he said the Constitution does not also require a separate hearing about whether police may keep cars or other property in the meantime.
Previous:Buxton homers twice, Ryan works 7 scoreless innings as Twins end 7
Next:Macy's tops expectations for the first quarter as luxury and beauty sales shine
You may also like
- Election 2024: Biden and the Democrats raised far less in April than Trump and the GOP
- Japan teen Anraku wins Asiad men's combined sport climbing
- Pic Story: Nursing Worker of Elderly Care in Yuhu District, Hunan
- China's Chen and Quan Win Women's 10m Platform Synchronised at Swimming Worlds
- Wayne Bennett, at 74, signs a 3
- Foreign Ministry gets new spokesman
- Across China: All
- Giving Children in Mountains More Chances to Excel in Life
- Tagovailoa misses Dolphins' OTA day to attend Saban's charity golf tournament